Flashback Friday: Twilight by Stephenie Meyer (Don’t Hate)

TITLE: Twilight

AUTHOR: Stephenie Meyer

PUBLISHER: Little Brown, Books for Young Readers

LENGTH: 544 pages

SUMMARY: Isabella Swan’s move to Forks, a small, perpetually rainy town in Washington, could have been the most boring move she ever made. But once she meets the mysterious and alluring Edward Cullen, Isabella’s life takes a thrilling and terrifying turn. Up until now, Edward has managed to keep his vampire identity a secret in the small community he lives in, but now nobody is safe, especially Isabella, the person Edward holds most dear. The lovers find themselves balanced precariously on the point of a knife-between desire and danger.Deeply romantic and extraordinarily suspenseful, Twilight captures the struggle between defying our instincts and satisfying our desires. This is a love story with bite.

BRIDGE: This is the ultimate in Bridge books. While the literary merits of the series are few, this is a great way to get kids reading. The Twilight Saga is what I call a Gateway Book Series. These are the books that have popular appeal for whatever reason and have kids clamouring to read them. It helps tremendously that these books were made into movies because that gets even MORE kids wanting to read them. My point: this gets kids hooked into reading. No, these books aren’t going to win any awards for literary merit AND there are plot holes big enough to drive a truck through, but students will stay up all night reading them. Then, when they’re finished with the book and recovered from their sleep deprivation, they are going to come to you and ask for something else to read.

Because they’ve caught the bug. They’ve got the itch. They WANT to read.

That’s when you hit them with the good stuff. Turn them toward Kristin Cashore’s Graceling books. Suggest they try some Holly Black or James Dashner. Now that they have discovered the joy of reading, you can steer them toward complex text.

There are a few other things one can do with The Twilight Saga books. Edward is the quintessential Byronic hero and there are myriad lessons one could pull from the text and match up with more traditional Byronic heroes like Heathcliff from Wuthering Heights or Edmond Dantes from The Count of Monte Cristo. It is also interesting to take a generic plot diagram and have students create missing pieces for the elements of plot that are missing. Have students study how Meyer characterizes Bella & Edward’s characters and relationship. Then, have them debate whether or not Bella is a dependent member of an abusive relationship (as many argue).  Students can write better endings to each individual book or for the series as a whole.

Ultimately, we want our students reading and as much as The Twilight Series has been villified and criticized in literary circles, it has birthed a new generation of readers in this ever-growing technological society. And all good reading instructors know that even adults don’t always read “good literature”. Sometimes the brain needs a break. So here’s to authors who help create new readers and here’s hoping you’re reading something good.

Thumbs Up to THE EVOLUTION of MARA DYER by Michelle Hodkin

Click here to order

TITLE: The Evolution of Mara Dyer (Book 2 of The Mara Dyer Trilogy)

AUTHOR: Michelle Hodkin

PUBLISHER: Simon & Schuster Books for Young Readers

LENGTH: 544 pages

SUMMARY: (via amazon.com) The truth about Mara Dyer’s dangerous and mysterious abilities continues to unravel in this gripping sequel to the thrilling The Unbecoming of Mara Dyer.

Mara Dyer once believed she could run from her past.

She can’t.

She used to think her problems were all in her head.

They aren’t.

She couldn’t imagine that after everything she’s been through, the boy she loves would still be keeping secrets.

She’s wrong.

REVIEW: There was such anticipation with the release of this book and, overall, I enjoyed it. The first book, The Unbecoming of Mara Dyer ended with such a twisty cliffhanger that I thought I might waste away waiting on the continuation of Mara’s story. When I finally got my hands on the book, I was a little perturbed to find that there is definitely a touch of the “second-book lag” as with many second books in trilogies. A friend commented something to the effect that many trilogies follow this pattern:

1st book=introduce characters, conflict, and (if applicable) begin romantic relationship with steamy scenes and requisite swooning

2nd book=force a metaphorical wedge of some kind between love interests making steamy love scenes reek of longing and guilt, belabor the conflict, throw in a twist and/or new character to keep things interesting, leave readers wondering if 3rd book will be worth it

3rd book=remove obstacles for love relationship, include more steamy scenes,  resolve conflict (hopefully not too perfectly)

Evolution seems to follow this 2nd book template. The shock of the ending to the first book is mitigated by the continuing no-one-believes-me thread in the second book. This seems to become the focus of the entire book but the flashbacks provide much-needed relief from the Mara-pity-party.At times, one wants to shake Mara until her teeth chatter to snap her out of her self-loathing.

However, the introduction of a more established link between Noah and Mara is interesting and adds a new layer to the mystery behind Mara’s and Noah’s abilities. Noah is still blisteringly sultry and frustrating but readers do get a glimpse of his inner machinations that is not seen in Unbecoming. One thing is certain, the mystery will only be solved with Noah and Mara working together. With more sinister forces working against them than they first suspected, as is revealed at the end of Evolution, it will take more than Noah’s money and Mara’s visions to save them both.

Using CHOPSTICKS in the Classroom

20121226-224928.jpg

TITLE: Chopsticks

AUTHORS/CREATORS: Jessica Anthony & Rodrigo Corral

PUBLISHER: Razorbill

LENGTH: 304 pages

SUMMARY: (via amazon.com) Glory is a piano prodigy.

After her mother died, she retreated into her music. Her father raised her with the goal of playing sold out shows at Carnegie Hall and across the globe. Brilliant and lonely, Glory is drawn to Frank, who moves in next door. She loses herself in his paintings and drawings, mix CD’s and late-night IM conversations. Soon, Frank becomes both her connection to the world–and her escape from reality.

Before long, Glory is unable to play anything but the song “Chopsticks”; F and G notes moving closer together, and farther apart.

Now, Glory has disappeared. But nothing is what it seems. And we must decide what is real, what is imagined, and what has been madness all along.

BRIDGE: Visual literacy is becoming more and more the norm in education. It’s not new; it’s been around for years in comic books and Sunday morning comics. But as technology advances and our students are increasingly connected to their laptops and Smartphones, educators are having to redefine what literacy means and how to meet students’ needs in preparing them for the 21st century post-secondary experiences. Even jobs once thought to require fewer literate skills like flipping burgers or stocking shelves are requiring proficiency with visual media as ordering and inventory systems have become digitized and computerized. As literacy teachers, we have to adapt our previously text-based instruction to incorporate visual elements and teach them to infer, analyze, and create original pieces that include visual elements.

Chopsticks is a great novel with which to begin. The story line is clear and it is not what students will immediately think of as a difficult read. The appeal of the visual medium will snatch readers’ interest and motivate reluctant readers. While reading, the different media used to craft the story tell such a believable tale that one forgets it is fiction. Yet the nuances in the story and the depictions are subtly layered. The end of the story will send readers back into the heart of the novel to compare graphics and what little text exists to try and make sense of the resolution. Students will have to infer, analyze subtext, and draw conclusions about what the major and minor images indicate about the real message of the story.

This book is perfect to pair with the arts and other electives which always seems difficult to manage as a sole pairing. Glory’s talent with piano is a perfect segue into musical terminology and awareness of the discipline. While “Chopsticks” is a fairly simple composition, students could study piano aficionados and different styles from the same period of music. And Frank’s artistic ability could work well with many art concepts including pencil drawings, shading, still life, portraits, and abstract depictions. In addition, the book could be paired with a psychology course as students move through discussions of mental illnesses and how they manifest. And, more than anything, it’s just a damn good story.

READERS: This book will appeal to reluctant readers and students who might normally be labeled part of the “fringe” or even “emo” but that is not the sole appeal. Any reader who feels like his choices are being made for him or one who feels that her parents don’t approve of her boyfriend (so basically ALL teens) will connect with Chopsticks.

OTHER TITLES: Raders who like this book will also enjoy Hard Love by Ellen Wittlinger, The Perks of Being a Wallflower by Stephen Chbosky, or Why We Broke Up by Daniel Handler and Maira Kalman.

Death is the New Black

There always seems to be a new “hot” thing that sweeps through Young Adult literature. Several years ago it was cliques of girls in exclusive locales: Harrison’s Clique series, Von Ziegesar’s Gossip Girl books, and more recently The Pretty Little Liars books.  But ghost stories, Gothic legend, and the end of the human race have fascinated generations of campers and slumber-partiers alike. These decidedly grim topics have become the next big wave in YA titles and jump-started authors’ and publishers’ renewed, 21st century obsession with death.

Vampires broke through first with Meyer’s Twilight phenomenon, followed by The Vampire Diaries books, and the House of Night books by P.C. Cast.  Now, it seems readers are making the slow evolution from the undead to the undying to the truly dead. YA readers’ interest in vampires morphed into another area of morbid interest with zombies. And now on the shelves, zombies are competing with mediums and ghosts for sales.

The first book that made an impression on me was Kimberly Derting’s The Body Finder.  Soon after, a whole slew of teens interacting with the undying and hungry or the dead but not departed began to appear on the shelves. Some notables include Anna Dressed in Blood by Kendare Blake, Enclave by Anne Aguirre, and The Forest of Hands and Teeth by Carrie Ryan. More recently I have stumbled upon The Raven Boys by Maggie Stiefvater and The Diviners by Libba Bray. I’ve also been introduced to some emerging authors, one of whom is Annalise Hulse who is delving into the world of ghosts and haunting with her Evangeline Devine series.

None of these premises are completely new. We have gone from the elite and their dramas to vampires’ ever-alluring appeal to human women. Then zombies take over forcing the main characters to harness their inner-Katniss and now teen guys and girls are communing with the dead to mete out justice for friends and family. The best part is that even though the templates might be familiar, these new breed of YA authors are infusing new and unique life into the tried and true tales that continue to enthrall readers through the years. Which begs the question: Which old interest will become new again as YA continues to evolve?

Author Elizabeth Wein Responds to CODE NAME VERITY Discussion

A while back, I posted a virtual “conversation” that my friend K and I had about Code Name Verity. K and I had been tweeting about the book for a while and were lucky enough to have the author, Elizabeth Wein, join in our Twitter conversation. I knew I would blog about it when I had finished and Ms. Wein seemed interested in hearing our thoughts on the book. Honestly, I was excited about her interaction but dubious that it would go farther than that one Twitter conversation. When I originally posted this review-conversation, I made sure to include Ms. Wein in my tweets. When I got no response, I assumed that I had been right. She was just being polite during the initial conversation. I was pleasantly proven wrong. Just last week, Ms. Wein did read the post and she had quite a bit to say in response to our conversation. Below I’m reposting my original post along with Ms. Wein’s comments.

I’ve already posted about Code Name Verity by Elizabeth Wein but I just can’t stop thinking about it. I just sit and say, “Damn.” A close friend and sometimes-poster on YABookBridges (@katsprad) was lucky enough to receive a galley of the book. I happened on to it by accident in the library. I had heard a few people mentioning it on Twitter so I decided to see what all the hype was about. Because we live in different states now, it’s difficult for K & I to actually get to speak about books, which is one of the pillars of our friendship. In this case, we were lucky to have already scheduled a visit around the time we finished this book. K finished reading it before I did and she warned me that she was wrecked. I figured if I had made it through The Fault in Our Stars that I was good. How could it be any better (or worse, depending on your perspective) than TFIOS? What follows is a modified transcript of our conversation about Code Name Verity via emails, texts, tweets, and one-to-one conversation.

K: I did warn you [about the book's impact], and at the same time I told you that YOU MUST READ THIS BOOK. Any book that leaves such a mark on the heart is not to be missed.
Me: This is the best book I’ve read this year. I would wager it’s the best book I’ve read in the last five years. You know this is saying something since I’m a diehard Nerdfighter and TFIOS came out this year. I can’t stop thinking about this book and peeling back the layers Wein has so carefully folded into this novel.
When K & I started talking about this book, we were talking over one another, rushing to have this point made or that observation heard.
K: I’m pretty sure the people near us at the bar thought we were arguing—or crazy. We always have much to say about books we both enjoy, but CNV is special, and our conversation about it has been much richer. We’re STILL talking about it!
ME: The soul of this story is the characters.
One thing K & I both noticed was that while Queenie is the narrator, readers actually get Maddie’s story first.
K: At the beginning, I was a little frustrated with the unclear narrator because I worried that the author was being coy—often these devices/ploys end up being strictly for effect and the plot and/or characters aren’t worth the reader’s effort or patience. In this case, it was all worth the wait and the mystery added a layer of tension and commitment (reader to characters). I was even more watchful and engaged than I usually am at the beginning of a novel because I was trying to solve the problem of the characters’ identities and relationships.
Me: I agree; I worried it could put readers off but Wein makes it work because Queenie’s voice from the first sentence is compelling and engaging. She is defiant and completely self-possessed. She knows what’s being done to her, what she’s doing, and she never flinches from it.
K: Absolutely matter of fact and honest. While the narration is unconventional, we trust Queenie. So readers get Maddie’s nice base of dependability told with Queenie’s panache. Queenie is the flash and Maddie is the steady burn.

WEIN COMMENTS: I love this. I think it’s spot on. A recent reviewer felt that their friendship didn’t work because they were essentially not that different as characters. I am baffled by this criticism. They seem such polar opposites to me, not in terms of education or class, but in terms of personality.

In reference to the narrative structure, WEIN COMMENTS: I wanted to add to your discussion of the way the story is told. When I set out to write it, I really conceived it as Maddie’s story – that Queenie would tell it from the beginning and Maddie would continue it until the end. It didn’t really occur to me how complex this would make the structure of the narrative, or that some people would find it confusing. It does put some readers off – they get hung up wondering how Queenie could know so much about what Maddie’s thinking (well, she’s making it up), or how she could presume to guess what Maddie feels about this or that (well, Maddie TOLD her), or how she can write a story from somebody else’s point of view (How can I, the AUTHOR, write a story from somebody else’s point of view? Well, like me, she’s crafting a novel. She even SAYS so). Or else people just find it confusing to have one story embedded in another. This really wasn’t a criticism I saw coming, and it kind of took me by surprise. I might have done it differently if I’d thought it would confuse people, I guess. But at the time it seemed like a good idea.
K & I both identified strongly with one character and we agreed that every one who reads this story, man or woman, will have the same experience.
ME: Queenie and Maddie’s characteristics are universal and the qualities one looks for in a loyal friend. That’s what they are at the core: loyal, knows-your-greatest-fears, will-raise-your-kids-if-you-die kind of friends. Queenie is inventive, fearless, relies on bravado more than skill, and just has pure guts. Maddie is skilled, logical, honest, and dogged.

WEIN COMMENTS: The other thing is, not everybody actually likes Queenie. This, I feel, is a criticism I can more readily relate to. Not everybody in the book likes her, either; she is headstrong and a liar and can be nasty. She presents herself as a coward, and some readers really fall for that and hate her for it… just like her fellow prisoners. I almost want to see this as a “WIN,” because I did set out to create a cowardly character, and I failed so miserably that it pleases me some people buy it.

And some readers just don’t relate to her. They don’t like her prose style, or her character type, or her attitude. And I can relate to that to, because not everybody gets along with everybody.

K: Their friendship is unusual; a seemingly odd couple, but balanced like yin & yang– dark and light, common and noble, steady and whimsical. But under the gloss of Queenie’s bravado is a sense of devastation at Maddie’s loss. The pain and regret she clearly feels about Maddie, especially in the face of the pain we’d expect her to feel about her present situation, but that SHE clearly doesn’t, makes us want to know all about Maddie herself—anyone who means that much to such a vibrant and indomitable person is someone we want to know.
ME: Both are SO STRONG and they are almost invincible together. One can see this immediately when they’re bringing in the lost German pilot. Maddie knows exactly what to do and Queenie has the moxy to pull it off. Neither of them would have been able to do it alone but it was sheer perfection with them working together.
K: Maddie knew exactly what to have the pilot do and Queenie knew how to say it, both in terms of language and in terms of delivery. If Maddie had been working alone, she might’ve barked instructions and terrified the already dazed pilot even more. Queenie would’ve known how to soothe the poor fellow, but she’d have had him crashing his plane. This is how the two girls discover that they’re almost made for each other, each balancing and enhancing the other’s strengths and weaknesses. Of course, they have to get over the fact that they don’t particularly like each other in order to become friends.
As the story progressed, we both began to wonder what drives these two women.
ME: They have a common goal: to effect change-to make a mark on the world so that each, in her own way, will not be forgotten.
K: What’s fascinating about Maddie and Queenie is how they each enact their shared reason for BEING so differently. If both girls believe the same thing—that the primary point of their lives is to do what’s in their power to make the world a better place—how is it possible that they do things so differently? I think there are superficial variations, like the dissimilar situations each girl gets into and each girl’s range of skills and options. I wonder if these external elements created the disparity in the girls’ actions?
Ultimately, though, we decided that it’s all about the girls’ internal value systems.
ME: Maddie has an unerring moral compass and she chooses to do the right thing regardless of the consequences for herself or anyone else. She doesn’t even consider structure or rules (RAF) when doing the right thing-she does right because it’s right. Queenie is going to make her mark on the world, right and wrong be damned. She works within the structure given her, whether rules or no, to just to play the game. She is invested in the game, not the good or bad outcome. This is what makes her such a good spy. When Queenie is taken to the interrogation room with the other operative and a gun, he breaks her down. It’s immoral to break a person that way, but Queenie goes along because it’s part of the game. Maddie would’ve been outraged.
K: But no matter how different they are from each other in terms of style or focus or skill, both of these women are determined to have an impact and make their lives mean something, and that bonds them even closer.

WEIN COMMENTS: I don’t know if I agree that they share the same goals. I don’t know if I agree that they even have goals. My sense is that neither one of them has any idea of the adult she will become, or what she will do with herself after the war – I actually feel like their “feminism” is sheerly war-connected, and an unknown factor when the war is over. I also love the idea of Maddie’s “moral compass.” The observation that she does what she knows to be right is a very wise one, and actually I think it’s THIS, built through the book, that convinces the reader that her final big decision is also right.
Wein slowly brings the women’s separate trajectories together when the narrative finally switches to Maddie’s voice.
ME: At first, I was convinced that Queenie was giving Maddie instructions on how to rescue Queenie from the hotel-prison. It became clear,
K: Wait! I don’t want to give spoilers. The book is so powerful and the mystery and suspense are so necessary to that power that I’d hate to diminish it for the readers. Queenie uses her narrative to give Maddie hints about her captors and location on the chance that the resourceful and resolute Maddie would move heaven and earth to rescue her friend. When it became clear, however, that rescue was out of the question, I couldn’t fathom Queenie’s hopes or intentions. Trying to decode Queenie’s plans and expectations ratcheted up the tension as the situations in which Queenie and Maddie find themselves became more and more dire. By the time the friends meet again, the stakes are life or death. I was always sure, when it came down to it, that Maddie would save Queenie-and Maddie does save her-but not in the happy-ending kind of way.
The devastating way Maddie saves Queenie elicited another barrage of questions from K and me.
K: Could you have done it?
ME: For certain people in my life but it most surely would have scarred me forever.
K: Me too, but don’t think I could have gone on. Maddie is able to put herself back together and live. Not just that night but for the rest of her life.
ME: Queenie wouldn’t have been able to do it.

WEIN ASKS: What makes you feel that Queenie wouldn’t have been able to do the same thing? (A serious question!)

ME: I feel like Queenie is the more dependent partner in their friendship. I think she accepts that Maddie’s resolution is the inevitable conclusion to her journey but I don’t think she would have accepted that for Maddie. I think she couldn’t have imagined a world where Maddie doesn’t exist. One sees this in her grief over Maddie’s assumed death at the beginning. Maddie seems to be constitutionally strong whereas Queenie seems to exhibit more bravado. I think her courage is a ruse, to a certain extent. She is convincing herself that she’s strong enough to handle her job and its consequences on a job-by-job basis. I’m not sure she has the “backbone” to make the decision that Maddie ultimately has to make.

K: Who is braver?
ME: I think a distinction needs to be made between “brave” (short term stoicism in the face of danger) and “courageous” (long term determination to live with calamity).
K: Then Queenie’s brave: she knows what the Germans are doing to her and what the outcome will be and yet she continues with her mission. Maddie is courageous: she stares down the emotional & psychological consequences; the ramifications, both personal and professional, that she will have to endure for the rest of her life.
ME: And Wein creates a friendship of such miraculous beauty that it takes only one phrase for the friends to plan, accept, and forgive the rescue that must, to save both Queenie and Maddie, be undertaken.

At one point during our Twitter conversation, K asked Wein if she has a Queenie: Do I have a Queenie? I do, yes. Obviously – how could I have written it otherwise? That is the one true thing about the book, the friendship at its heart.

ME: I think it appropriate to close discussing bravery.
K: I kept coming back to the bravery of Elizabeth Wein.
ME: It took Maddie-level courage to write this story with its ending.
K: We were given a true ending rather than a happy ending (which we would have accepted whole-heartedly because of our love of the characters and our fairy-tale-trained longing for nice, neat stories).
Ultimately, it is a story of truths. The story of true friendship. The story of true history. The story of true peril. The story of true love: the pure, unconditional kind of love that allows one to be the best version of herself.